DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
EGA
Docket No: 1476-15
23 March 2015
Dear (iii Tp annpeeey
This is in reference to your Application for Correction of
Military Record, DD Form 149, dated 3 February 2015. You have
requested that this Board review and remove the nonjudicial
punishments (NUP) you received on 23 August 2003, and 28 May
2004. In this regard, a thorough review of your official
military personnel file (OMPF) does not reveal the documentation
pertaining to the NJPs, and as such, no action is required by
this Board.
If, in the future, the NIP is filed in your OMPF, you may then
reapply for Board review. However, please be advised that you
should exhaust all of your administrative remedies within the
Navy, specifically, your chain-of-command, prior to petitioning
the Board for review of your OMPF.
‘In accordance with the foregoing, your case is hereby
administratively closed without prejudice. You may contact Mr.
Earl Andrews at 703-604-0716 if you have any further concerns or
questions regarding this matter.
Sinceyely,
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR667 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S COURTHOUSE ROAD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 TLG Docket No: 0667-14 2 June 2015 This is in reference to your Application for Correction of Military Record, DD Form 149, dated 8 January 2015. You have requested that this Board review and remove the nonjudicial punishment (NJP) you received on 14 March 2014. In this regard, a thorough review of your official military personnel file (OMPF) does not reveal the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4764 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TAL Docket No: 4764-14 8 April 2015 This is in reference to your Application for Correction of Military Records, DD Form 149, in which you requested removal of entries regarding desertion from both your Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) /Navy record and the records maintained by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), National Criminal Information Center (NCIC) . ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR951 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on ll February 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your desire to upgrade your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR583 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to wrongful drug use.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6971 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 15 April and 30 May 1986, you received (NUP) for two specification of failing to obey a lawful order, a period of four days of UA, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4513 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 April 2015. Arter careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7097 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018948
The filing document shows the applicant was notified of the GOMOR, but did not respond. Chapter 3 (OMPF), paragraph 3-6 (Authority for filing or removing documents from the OMPF), in pertinent part, provides that once properly filed in the OMPF, the document will not be removed from the record unless directed by one of the following, and shows in pertinent part, the Army Review Boards Agency, Army Board for Correction of Military Records, Army Discharge Review Board, Department of the Army...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6519 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2015. Subsequently, administrative separation action was initiated by reason of fraudulent entry due to the diagnosed nocturnal enuresis. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5075 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...